NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang described artificial intelligence at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference not as “alien intelligence,” but as software and hardware developed by humans that can be regulated under existing laws. Viewing safety as an engineering issue rather than a legal one, Huang argued that no new regulations are needed, that the free market will prevent unsafe products, and that companies are responsible for stopping when risks arise. The remarks drew criticism because NVIDIA profits from the industry. Critics cited the 2024 CrowdStrike crisis that grounded flights, the billions of dollars in compensation Meta paid over harm to children, and the negative effects of artificial intelligence in cyberattacks and societal incidents.
Why it matters
This approach sharpens the debate over whether responsibility for artificial intelligence safety should be left primarily to the companies developing the technology and to market oversight, rather than to public authorities introducing new rules. However, the CrowdStrike and Meta examples provide counterpoints showing that the consequences of problematic products can spread to users, companies, and society before the market responds. The fact that NVIDIA generates revenue from the industry also keeps alive the question of whether Huang’s anti-regulation stance can be regarded solely as a technical assessment. The key unresolved issue is how harm can be prevented when companies decide whether to stop in the face of risk, and to what extent existing laws will be sufficient to address the effects of artificial intelligence in cyberattacks and societal incidents.
Background
The CEO is not a new name in the FikirPilot archive: over the past 90 days, we have published 20 news stories mentioning this name; the latest was dated September 16, 2026.