According to The Guardian, Mosseri testified in a federal court in California in a case involving allegations that Meta designed its products to be addictive for young people and caused mental health problems. Rejecting the accusation that the company concealed negative information, Mosseri said he did not encourage his team to hide anything. When asked why the low usage rates of safety features for young people had not been disclosed, he replied that they did not publish every statistic.
The case, which is expected to last for weeks, will examine allegations brought by 29 states. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final decision on Meta’s liability and possible penalties. Meta said it could face penalties of up to $1.4 trillion if it loses the case.
Why it matters
The outcome of the case will determine whether Meta can be held legally responsible for its product design and safety practices for young people. For this reason, Mosseri’s defense that negative information was not concealed and that not every statistic on low usage rates was published is important in terms of how the company’s information-sharing practices and internal operations will be assessed. The fact that allegations from 29 states will be addressed throughout the proceedings shows that the case is not limited to the experience of a single user or app. The judge’s decision will clarify both Meta’s liability and the scope of the penalties the company could face; however, the fact that the case is expected to last for weeks means these issues will not be resolved immediately.
Background
Instagram is not a new name in the FikirPilot archive: over the past 90 days, we have published 3 articles mentioning this name, the most recent dated August 26, 2026. This development can be added alongside those records in our archive; readers can view the full timeline by following previous articles bearing the same name in the archive.